Sabine Klaschka vs Natalie Grandin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L W L
Form
L L W W L W W L L LH2H: Klaschka 1 - 1 Grandin
They have played 6 sets in total, with Klaschka winning 3 and Grandin winning 3. The last match between Klaschka and Grandin was at the Mackay, 13-10-2003, First, Hard with Sabine Klaschka getting the victory 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sabine Klaschka | 1 |
| Natalie Grandin | 1 |
Mackay(13-10-2003)
2
6
7
6
6
3
| Klaschka | Stats | Grandin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 133 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 44 | Age | 44 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 50% (125-126) | Career Total W/L | 47% (197-218) |
| $26,075 | Career Prize Money | $53,305 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 31 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sabine Klaschka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Natalie Grandin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kiki Bertens
Player
Natalie Grandin
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Natalie Grandin
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michelle Larcher De Brito
Player
Natalie Grandin
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Natalie Grandin
Player
Sachie Ishizu
63%
(
76 of
120)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Grandin
Player
Miki Miyamura
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Natalie Grandin
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Natalie Grandin
Player
Barbara Bonic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Grandin
Player
Pia Konig
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Natalie Grandin
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Garbine Muguruza
Player
Natalie Grandin
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (125/126) | Win/Loss | 47% (197/218) |
| 50% (290/286) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (467/490) |
| 50% (2581/2574) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (4366/4448) |
| 44% (24/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (132/124) |
| 49% (53/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (38/54) |
| 55% (42/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (18/23) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 35% (9/17) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 186 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 34 | Total Double Faults | 195 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 517.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.19 |
| 62% (421/679) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3813/6044) |
| 60% (253/421) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2269/3813) |
| 38% (101/265) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1046/2233) |
| 54% (36/67) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (303/714) |
| 43% (280/648) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2615/6080) |
| 39% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 44% (17/22) |
| 17% (1/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 41% (12/17) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (66/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (79/79) | Challenger W/L | 54% (110/94) |
| 73% (22/8) | Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 50% (125/250) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (195/411) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (24/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (46/90) |
| 47% (35/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (56/131) |
| 78% (138/108) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (215/168) |
| 22% (138/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (215/46) |
| 15% (113/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (200/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
